Race Readiness Report
Know exactly where the gaps are before race day
A sixteen-section personalised report that maps your actual race history against the demands of your goal race - terrain by terrain, dimension by dimension.
Not a generic training guide. Not a fitness calculator. A structured analysis of what the race requires, what you have already demonstrated, and exactly what is missing - with preparation race recommendations, aid station logistics, physical assessments, and prioritised next steps to close the gaps before it matters.
A verdict, not a vague score
The opening page gives a plain-English assessment of your current readiness, colour-coded across the six dimensions that actually determine whether you are prepared for your specific race.
Each dimension is rated against the specific demands of your goal race - not generic fitness standards. You can be strong on distance and still have a major gap on terrain specificity. The report makes that distinction visible.
Distance
128 km max vs 79 km target
Ascent
2,600 m max vs 3,226 m target
Descent
8.0 km covered of 21.3 km required
Terrain specificity
0.0 km trail/fell vs 49.1 km demanded
Time on feet
137.8 km effort-equiv vs 108.9 km goal
Overall confidence
1 of 19 demand types fully met
Example - Lakeland 50, Alex Thornton
Inside the report
Sixteen sections. Each answers a specific question about whether you are ready - and if not, what to do about it.
Section 01
Executive Readiness Verdict
The opening verdict page - overall readiness rating, the athlete's single biggest strength, primary risk, and the top preparation priorities. Also sets out what this report does and does not assess.
Race Readiness Summary
Lakeland 50 · Alex Thornton
Overall verdict
Not yet race-specific ready
Readiness at a glance
Distance
128 km max vs 79 km target
Ascent
2,600 m max vs 3,226 m target
Descent
8.0 km covered of 21.3 km
Terrain specificity
0.0 km trail/fell vs 49.1 km demanded
Time on feet
137.8 km effort-equiv vs 108.9 km goal
Overall confidence
1 of 19 demand types fully met
Section 02
Readiness Narrative
A plain-English synthesis of the full report - why the athlete is or is not broadly ready, what the course demands relative to their history, and what could still catch them out on race day.
Readiness Narrative
A synthesised assessment drawing on all sections of this report
Overall Readiness Assessment
Significant Preparation Required
Ultra Trail Snowdonia 100km · Alex Thornton
Findings by section
Race Character
△Only 23% runnable
Race Demands
✓Final third effort near avg
△6,770 m ascent demand
Athlete Experience
✓Distance-comparable experience
Experience Gaps
△7 demand types with zero experience
Alex Thornton has 12 races on record across 8 years. Vertical experience is the primary gap: 6,770 m ascent required vs career best of 2,600 m. Dedicated hill and mountain training is the most important preparation focus.
Section 03
Readiness Scorecard
A structured summary across six readiness dimensions: Distance, Ascent, Descent, Terrain specificity, Technical terrain, and Aid logistics. Each is rated Strong / Moderate / Major gap with the underlying numbers shown.
Readiness Scorecard
How Alex measures up against Ultra Trail Snowdonia 100km across every dimension
Distance
128 km max vs 105 km target
Ascent
2,600 m max vs 6,770 m target
Descent
123.0 km covered of 43.8 km
Terrain specificity
234.0 km trail/fell vs 71.7 km demanded
Technical terrain
0.0 km technical trail vs 22.2 km demanded
Aid logistics
7 stations · longest gap 15.3 km
Overall confidence
3 of 19 demand types fully met
Section 04
Race Overview
A high-level picture of the course: mapped route, terrain composition, and key course metrics. Use this page to build a shared mental model of the race before reading the deeper analysis.
Race Overview
Course profile, terrain character, and historical conditions · 24 July 2026
78.6 km
Distance
3,226 m ↑
Ascent
3,315 m ↓
Descent
41 m/km
Climb/km
Terrain composition
Trail
36.7 km · 53%
Gravel
12.3 km · 18%
Road
8.1 km · 12%
Technical Trail
6.7 km · 10%
Fell
5.7 km · 8%
2025 finishers
1,000 finishers
Section 05
Elevation
The elevation profile, composition, and climbing load show how ascent is distributed across the course - when the hard work arrives, how the course is weighted front-to-back, and how the climbing density compares to races already completed.
Elevation
Elevation profile and climbing load - Ultra Trail Snowdonia 100km
Climbing
39.7 km · 38%
Descending
43.8 km · 42%
Flat/Rolling
21.8 km · 21%
Key segments
▲ km 70.0–76.0
+1,002m
6.0 km
▼ km 76.0–82.0
−912m
6.0 km
▲ km 1.0–7.0
+809m
6.0 km
Section 06
Race Demands Profile
Three technical charts: the gradient histogram reveals how much of the course is steep, the effort multiplier chart shows the energy cost of each section, and the technical terrain panel identifies where off-road ground falls in the race.
Race Demands Profile
Gradient distribution, climbing load, and effort multiplier
Gradient distribution - km at each slope band
≥15% ↑
2.3
8–15% ↑
6.8
3–8% ↑
11.5
0–3%
32.3
3–8% ↓
11
8–15% ↓
7.9
≥15% ↓
5.8
41% near-flat (within ±3%)
mixed terrainAvg effort multiplier
0.94× flat running63% of ascent before halfway
front-loadedSection 07
Race Demands Profile (continued)
Demand summary cards quantify the four key physical challenges - climbing volume, descending load, final third demands, and effort variability. Late-race pattern data shows how athletes typically manage fatigue on this course.
Race Demands Profile (continued)
Demand summary and race pattern data
Climbing demand
3,226 m over 23.8 km
30% of course
Steepest: 13.9% avg
(km 12.3–14.8)
Descending demand
3,315 m over 21.3 km
27% of course
Steepest: 11.9% avg
(km 27.8–30.5)
Final third demands
km 52.4–78.6 covers 17.0 km
564 m remaining ascent
Effort multiplier: 1.05×
Harder than average
Section 08
Athlete Overview
A profile of the athlete's competitive history, including career highlights, recent results, and category finishes over the last two years. This page establishes the baseline from which all readiness comparisons on subsequent pages are drawn.
Athlete Overview
Alex Thornton · MV40 · Dark Peak Fell Runners · 2018–2025
12
Races
11
Finishes
1
DNFs
7 yrs
Career
Recent races (last 2 years)
Hardwolds 80
2025
21:44
128km
Yorkshire Wolds Ultra
2024
8:18
54km
Hardwolds 40
2024
9:36
74km
Lakeland 50
2024
-
79km
Section 09
Experience Gaps
Every terrain type on the goal course is listed - alongside how many kilometres of that terrain the athlete has covered in previous races. Red and amber rows identify where targeted build-up would have the most impact.
Experience Gaps
Every terrain demand of Lakeland 50 - ordered by distance on course
Mild Climb
Trail · avg +2.8%
7.6
km
Surface gapFlat
Trail · avg +0.1%
7.1
km
Surface gapSustained Descent
Road · avg −7.4%
5.9
km
CoveredSteep Descent
Trail · avg −9.4%
5.3
km
No experienceMild Climb
Gravel · avg +2.8%
5.2
km
Surface gapSteep Climb
Trail · avg +12.6%
4.5
km
Surface gapRolling
Fell · avg 0.0%
3.2
km
No experienceSection 10
Demands Built Up
The athlete's peak single-race load versus what this race demands. Bar charts compare highest distance, ascent, and flat-equivalent effort against the goal race targets - the fastest way to spot which dimensions are under-prepared.
Demands Built Up
Peak load recorded vs Lakeland 50 demands
Distance
128 km
Target: 79 km
✓ Demand met
Ascent
2,600 m
Target: 3,226 m
81% of target demand
Recent race history vs targets
Hardwolds 80 2025
Yorkshire Wolds Ultra 2024
Hardwolds 40 2024
Hardmoors 55 2023
Section 11
Aid Station Analysis
Gap analysis between aid stations, comparison against the athlete's largest previously-managed unsupported stretch, and preparation flags for nutrition logistics and drop bag strategy.
Aid Station Analysis
Gap analysis and logistics preparation for Ultra Trail Snowdonia 100km
7
Stations
15.3 km
Longest gap
13.2 km
Average gap
No
Drop bags
Stations
Station 1
14 km
+14.0 km
Station 2
29.3 km
+15.3 km
Station 3
41.7 km
+12.4 km
Station 4
54 km
+12.3 km
Station 5
67.4 km
+13.4 km
No drop bag support - all kit and nutrition must be self-carried for the full 105 km.
Section 12
Suggested Preparation Races
Nearby races ranked by how effectively they would close the athlete's identified experience gaps. Each suggestion lists the specific terrain types it covers and the kilometres it would contribute toward closing each gap.
Suggested Preparation Races
Races within 500 miles ranked by experience gap coverage
Ultra Trail Snowdonia 100km
105.4 km · 6,770 m · 146.4 mi away
›Flat Rolling / Trail - 19.4 km (88%)
›Runnable Descent / Trail - 15.0 km (100%)
›Steady Climb / Trail - 9.0 km (100%)
›+4 more gap types addressed
Marathon Eryri
42.0 km · 819 m · Next: 24 Oct 2026
›Flat Rolling / Trail - 25.0 km (100%)
›Steady Climb / Trail - 7.0 km (78%)
›Gentle Descent / Trail - 3.0 km (22%)
›+3 more gap types addressed
Section 13
Experience Context
Three contextual comparisons that put the goal race in perspective: scale ratios showing how much bigger this race is than anything the athlete has done, the biggest climb on the course vs their personal best, and which past race most resembles the opening section.
Experience Context
How Alex's past races compare to the demands of Lakeland 50
Course scale
At 78.6 km, shorter than longest (127.8 km). The 1.2× ascent increase is the bigger step up.
0.6×
Distance
1.2×
Ascent
0.8×
Effort
Biggest challenge
Main climb (km 17–22, 536m over 5km at 10.7%) is 2.8× bigger than any climb in history.
Biggest recorded: 1 km, 190m ↑ (Hardmoors Saltburn, 2023)
Opening profile
Opening 15.7 km similar to how Wold Rangers Way Ultra (2022) started.
Similarity 92% - Flat Rolling on Trail
Section 14
Self-Reflection
Questions the data cannot answer - areas where honest self-assessment can significantly change the outlook for race day. Injuries, sleep, consistency, footwear, nutrition, pain, and goal realism.
Self-Reflection
Questions the data cannot answer - to consider honestly before race day
Have you been injured in the last few months?
Have you slept enough and at sufficient quality in the last few months?
Have you trained consistently for at least 16 weeks?
Have you considered whether your footwear is correct for the demands of this race?
Have you practised your race nutrition strategy - and does your body tolerate it?
Are you currently carrying any pain or tightness that you are hoping will be fine on the day?
Is your goal time based on evidence - or is it hopeful?
These questions are not designed to discourage you. They surface factors predictive models cannot see. Addressing even one honestly will do more than any additional training session.
Section 15
Physical Self-Assessments
Practical tests to identify strength gaps, imbalances, and flexibility limitations that may not be visible in race data. Grouped by category with step-by-step instructions and what to record.
Physical Self-Assessments
Tests to identify strength gaps, imbalances, and flexibility limitations
Priority assessments
Split-Squat Control
ImbalanceSingle-leg sit-to-stand
StrengthSingle Leg Balance
ImbalanceKnee-to-wall
FlexibilityStep-down control test
ImbalanceSingle Leg Calf Raise
StrengthSection 16
Suggested Next Steps
Prioritised actions for the preparation period - specific training focus areas, race-day logistics to confirm, and the most impactful gaps to address before the start line.
Suggested Next Steps
Prioritised actions derived from the gap analysis and course demands
Priority
Develop quad strength for climbing
Strength & Conditioning
Eccentric loading for steep descents
Strength & Conditioning
Ankle stability for uneven terrain
Strength & Conditioning
Seek technical trail exposure
Terrain Specificity
Build a fuelling strategy
Race Preparation
Recommended
Practise efficient power hiking
Terrain Specificity
Confirm footwear for the terrain
Equipment
No drop bag support - practise self-sufficiency
Race Preparation
Built from actual data
Every finding in the report is derived from real sources. There are no generic benchmarks or assumed fitness levels.
Your race history
Every finished race on record: distance, ascent, terrain type, position, and time. The report works from actual performance data, not self-reported fitness.
Course GPX & terrain classification
Gradient distribution, terrain surface, and section-by-section effort cost derived from the race's GPX file and elevation data. Not estimates - direct course analysis.
Specific enough to act on
Vague readiness assessments don't change preparation. The report names exactly which terrain type is the gap, how many kilometres of it the race demands, and which preparation races would close it - ranked by how much of the gap each one addresses.
For Alex Thornton preparing for Lakeland 50, Ultra Trail Snowdonia addresses 86% of identified experience gaps. Marathon Eryri, available in October, covers 50%. That's the information that changes which race gets entered next.
Example - Alex Thornton · Lakeland 50
Ultra Trail Snowdonia 100km
105.4 km · 6,770 m ascent
Addresses 9 identified gap types - closes 100% of Runnable Descent, Steady Climb, and Major Climb gaps on trail
Marathon Eryri
42.0 km · 819 m ascent
Addresses 8 gap types - 100% of Flat Rolling gap, 78% of Steady Climb gap. Next race: 24 Oct 2026
Get a report for your target race
Each report is generated for you and your specific race. Provide your race history and your goal race, and we'll do the rest.
Reports are typically delivered within 48 hours of receiving your race history.